The Dr. Rhythm Top 10 is music that represents talent, artistry, innovation and unique style. We encourage you to research and discover this music on your own.
Mouse over selection for more, listen to examples though Amazon below.
The Beatles
"Taxman"
We know President-elect Obama will raise taxes, however, the question remains, will it help our country, and will he keep to his campaign promise of tax-cuts for the middle class? Let's allow George Harrison's song guide us, ironically written when he realized how much he was paying in taxes.
Beastie Boys
"Fight for your Right"
Whether you are for winning the war, pulling out troops we can all reflect this Veterans Day on how freedom and liberty are worth fighting for when necessary. War is an atrocious part of this world, but we respect those that have fought for our rights in this country. Replace the word "party" with "freedom" this song is quite appropriate...
Pulp, "Cocaine Socialism"
I'll let you figure this one out. Either way it is still a pretty good song.
Lisa Loeb, "Stay"
Gov. Sarah Palin was one of the most dynamic vice presidential candidates in history. Many are crying for her to stay in national politics and according the recent interview with Greta van Sustern, she has not ruled out running in 2012. Well, despite the vitriolic array of slander attributed to her candidacy, she could have success in the national arena. Just like the song says, "You try to give away a keeper, or keep me 'cause you know, you're just so scared to lose, and you say, 'stay.'"
A Flock of Seagulls, "I Ran"
I never heed to poise an appropriate pun. You could spin this in two ways, it is either a country or a metaphor, which one is for you to decide. This 80s classic reminds us of how much fun future-synth pop could be.
Buckcherry, "Imminent Bail Out"
Will the auto industry get a bail out? That's what we are all wondering. This indie-alt-post-metal-semi-scream-thrash rock song does not really answer any questions, nor is it really a great song, but the title is worth its weight in gold.
Kenny Rogers, "The Gambler"
Sen. McCain took a real gamble running for a second time and although he lost he still showed a strong sense of patriotism and good character. Say what you will about Senator McCain but he has always stood by his principles and has served our country with honor.
Miles Davis, "So What"
Miles Davis reinvented himself yearly according to jazz historians. What's to say that politics cannot do the same. Democrat, Republican, so what? Let us get something done and stop making teams.
Stephen MacDonald,
"The Balance of Power"
From the series, "Songs for Social Studies" this song would have been a good for Joe Biden to listen to before the Vice Presidential debate. He mistakenly characterized the Vice President's duties and role in government which the media never followed up on. Sometimes we forget what we learned in high school, but I urge Vice President-elect Biden to bone up on his new position. Listen to it here, http://www.songsfor.com/audiosamples/10s.mp3.
The Doors "When the Music's Over"
Thank God it's over! Perhaps the most exhausting election ever. Let's look toward the future and support our new President, no matter who you voted for. No more hate and anti-American rhetoric. Let's thrive and get down with this funky Doors tune.
Musical Health, earbuds kill...or maybe just perturb: A "study" presented to the American Medical Association by "top researchers" suggests that earbuds, or previously known as earphones, can slightly perturb and/or distrupt a pacemaker or defibrillator. The culprit is the magnets used in the speaker portion of the earbuds, not the earbuds themselves. The problem with both the "study" and the way the media has reported it is that they exclusively use the word "earbuds" and not neodymium magnets. Neodymium is a metal that is used in combination with iron and boron to create powerful magnets that are now often used in speakers/headphone/earphone technologies, computer hard drive motors, toys such as Magnetix and Magna Man, and some other hobby kits.
They are one of the strongest magnets available to consumers and often cited as dangerous when handled inappropriately. The "study" was commissioned most likely, though there is little to no information about how the study was conducted as of yet, in response of the popularity of iPods and other music playback devices. However, the media and others picked up on the earbuds' association to iPods. So now there are numerous headlines such as, "iPod Earbuds Could Affect Pacemakers And Defibrillators" and not "Neodymium Magnets Could Affect Pacemakers And Defibrillators." Why? Well that is simple. No one knows what neodymium magnets are. But that is not an excuse. It is a well-known fact among scientists and medical doctors that magnetic fields can disrupt medical devices like pacemakers and defibrillators, as well as any other device that can receive magnetic fields. Credit cards and computer hard drives are also at risk, perhaps more so than any pacemaker.
The "study" does not indicate how likely an occurrence earbud-to-chest contact is to people with pacemakers. Does this happen often? Do people with pacemakers actually use earbuds, if so what is the percentage? Nor does the "study" indicate whether it tested other equipment with neodymium magnets. People with pacemakers and defibrillators should also avoid hugging speakers, and computer hard drive motors too right? I do not question the danger of strong magnets, but the lack of information about the study, and the viral display of words like "iPod" in media headlines is simply irresponsible. DIY Music, do we see a trend coming? : The owners of the Beatles' music have just made a deal to create a Rock Band-esque video game of their music. -- Intel has just recently released Intel Studio an online community of indie music fans to listen to and rate unsigned bands, where the winner receives a record deal with promotion and concert tours. -- Microsoft and researchers at USC are creating software applications that can intelligently provide musical accompaniment for both professional and novice musicians to the point where style and harmony can be simulated to a high degree. -- Georgia Tech is develop a robot percussionist that can more intuitively interact with human musicians.
Can I reiterate what I have been preaching for months? -- Interaction is key. Earth to the Music Industry..get on board. The video game industry is far more successful monetarily than the music industry could ever hope to be. With the Beatles' music arriving to the Guitar Hero phenomena what is next in the DIY music world? Should we stop with just rock instrument video game controllers? How about the Keytair Hero, or Sitar Hero? Perhaps Violin Virtuoso, or Cello Chanticler? OR What if we used this phenomena for learning? There is significant evidence that learning a musical instrument can improve the understanding of several subjects like math and science. Why not create a video game where people of all ages can learn the piano, guitar or to sing?
As for the net-ether of rating unsigned bands. We have seen this before. Pre-internet society used "Star Search" which is now essentially "American Idol." The internet has several websites that give unsigned bands an opportunity to be heard such as unsigned.com, jamwave.com, and alternativeaddiction.com. The question is whether these types of internet venues are viable for the artists. Do they really work?
The whole DIY at home music is getting more accessible to the novice. As Alice Cooper once said, "Everybody has a band these days, even my Uncle is in a band." It is true, lots of people play music, record music, write music, all which is made available for public consumption. Honestly, most of this music is not very good. BUT this does not mean I discourage it from existing. Music is music, it has a right to exist. Software is being developed to help the untrained musician by providing tools that can guide the novice through more difficult musical decisions. These include how to harmonize, shape a melody or provide various stylistically influenced accompaniments. A nice tool for beginners or novice musicians not trained in these areas, but most likely will not create brilliant musicians by the millions in the future. However, I still encourage everyone to engage in music making activities, just do not expect to become the next Radiohead. It may happen, but it is not likely. I do not expect to win a Pulitzer just because I publish through this site. It could happen, but not likely, yet I still do it. And we are all better off for it.
In good musical health,
Dr. Rhythm
Ask the Doctor - 9.27.08 (want to ask the doctor? click here)
"To Drop a Class, or Not Drop a Class "
Dear Dr. Rhythm,
I am taking a music history class about jazz. I find that I really don't like or understand jazz and am seriously thinking about dropping the class. Do you any words to convince me not to?
AJ
----
Dear AJ,
First, I'll assume that your either are seeking or engaging in a university education. At most universities, undergraduates have to take what is commonly known as general interest/education/studies courses. These courses usually encompass a wide variety of liberal arts, science and humanities topics.
Second, I'll assume that you are taking this class as a general course for your degree. Many students ask, "Why do I need to take these boring general classes?" It is a legitimate question which many professors and administrators do not answer.
The most common answer is that in a university education it is important to cultivate a diverse and interdisciplinary education. This means even students planning to go into engineering should take courses in the arts and languages. However, despite this being a very good asset to a broad and complete education, there is another good reason to both take and be successful in these general study courses.
When you leave college you are entering a job market where you have little to no experience in the field you are pursuing. This can be your greatest asset and liability. However, these general studies courses display an important part of your ability to learn and be successful. You could be a brilliant engineer, but if you show a consistent pattern of low grades in what are suppose to be simple classes, then it is possible that an employer may find you more of a risk than an asset. Why?
The reason for this is these classes show you can learn new subjects successfully and quickly. Even once you find employment there will always be new things to learn and if you can show that you have a track record of this behavior it could give you an extra advantage over another employee. Plus, you will have the experience of learning new things fast in which you may not have been entirely interested. A valuable skill for saving time.
So do not give up and make the time invested thus far a complete waste. Plus, you may learn you actually like jazz in the end...
In good musical health,
Dr. Rhythm
--------
"Brit's 'Womanizer' "
Dear Dr. Rhythm,
What do you think of B. Spears' new single, "Womanizer?"
ZL
-----
Dear ZL,
For those that have not yet heard the new single released September 26th, 2008 you can listen using the portal on the right. I usually do not judge music in such a way as to say, "I like it," or "I don't like it." But this song could be the first step to a new Spears Empire, if she makes the right decisions in her song choices.
"Womanizer" begins much like a typical Prodigy tune circa 2002, but evolves into a swingy, electro-pop blues thing with a semi-rememberable chorus repeating the phrase, "Womanizer, Womanizer, You're a Womanizer, baby." Overall, it should get a B+ for production value. The reason it is not in the A range is because it borrows a whole bunch of pop clichés and seems to be trying too hard.
What Spears could be really good at is evolving away from the "pop sound" and more into the solo arena, much like Sara Bareilles, or the recent indie-pop singer Yael Naim. Emphasis on the word, "could." Spears does have a good voice when it is not ultra-EQed and post-processed, and when she is not using that "whiny" nose-filtered, head-voice thing she does like in "Oops, I did it again." If she could harness her real talent and move away from the Garageband synthesizer, perhaps she could find a whole new voice in the world of music.
For now she seems to gravitate towards the scantily-dressed, over-electrified, glit-pop that seems to make more insta-money. Though perhaps when she turns a ripe 27 years old on the "Circus" album debut December 2nd, she will realize that the glit is not good for the gander. I do not really know what that last sentence means, by the way, but it sounds good. Very similar to what I think Britney is doing in this song.
Be bold Brit. Take a stand. Put on some clothes, and stop kissing guys in the airplane bathroom!